Francis Fukuyama. Sfarsitul istoriei si ultimul om. Pe masura ce tumultuosul secol XX se indreapta plin de spaima spre sfarsitul sau prabusirea comunismului. Recenzia 1. Fukuyama argumenteaza ca democratia liberala de sorginte occidentala nu inseamna altceva decat sfarsitul unei evolutii. IN WATCHING the flow of events over the past decade or so, it is hard to avoid the feeling that something very fundamental has happened in world history.
|Published (Last):||11 December 2012|
|PDF File Size:||10.58 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||9.74 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
In the latter, he qualified his original “end of history” thesis, arguing that since biotechnology increasingly allows humans to control their own istoieiit may allow humans to alter human naturethereby putting liberal democracy at risk. Maoism, rather than being the pattern for Asia’s future, became an anachronism, and it was the mainland Chinese who in fact were decisively influenced by the prosperity and dynamism of their overseas co-ethnics – the ironic ultimate victory of Taiwan.
Labor has traditionally been understood in the Western liberal economic tradition as an essentially unpleasant activity undertaken for the sake of the satisfaction of human desires and the relief of human pain.
In the century and a half since they wrote, their intellectual legacy has been relentlessly assaulted from all directions. He especially singled out Islamwhich he described as having “bloody borders”. Singura soluie pentru el este pstrarea unui spaiu intim, profund personal, reprezentat de o moralitate elementar, dar i prin pstrarea thymosului pentru a rmne ntotdeauna propriul su stpn. All of these developments, so much at odds with the terrible history of the first half of the century when totalitarian governments of the Right and Left were on the march, suggest the need to look again at the question of whether there is some deeper connecting thread underlying them, or whether they are merely accidental instances of good luck.
It may be possible to return to traditional Marxism-Leninism for a while as a simple rallying point for those who want to restore the authority that Gorbachev has dissipated.
In his bestselling The End of History and the Last Man, Francis Fukuyama argued that the end of the Cold War would also mean the beginning of a struggle for position in the rapidly emerging order of 21st-century capitalism. Apart from pointing out that capitalist democracies are still riven with poverty, racial tension, and the like, Marxists also reject Fukuyama’s reliance on Hegel. In Falling Behind, Francis Fukuyama gathers together some of the world’s leading scholars on the subject to explain the nature of the gap and how it came to be.
Aceast ultim component este rspunztoare de cele mai multe evenimente istorice, istoriek exemplu revoluia din din Romnia. When the natural fear of death leads one combatant to submit, the relationship of master and slave is born.
Insisting that we cannot divorce economic life from cultural life, he contends that in an era when social capital may be as important as franxis capital, only those societies with a high degree of social trust will be able to create the flexible, large-scale business organizations that are needed to compete in the new global economy.
There would still be a high and perhaps rising level of ethnic and nationalist violence, since those are impulses incompletely played out, even in parts of the post-historical world. At the modern stage, the ability to build up material wealth at an accelerated rate on the basis of front-ranking science and high-level techniques and technology, and to distribute it fairly, and through joint efforts to restore and protect the resources necessary for mankind’s survival acquires decisive importance.
Therefore, Marxists like Perry Anderson have been among Fukuymaa fiercest critics. El nu este nici un “lichidator al marxismului”, nici un clinician care constata simptomele unei ideologii ce agonizeaza.
Carti francis fukuyama
Francis Fukuyama, n cartea Sfritul istoriei i ultimul om aduce o perspectiv foarte tentant i foarte optimist asupra finalului secolului XX i nceput de secol XXI, afirmnd supremaia democraiei liberale ca unic soluie a unui stat contemporan. In the weeks after the attacks, Fareed Zakaria called the events “the end of the end of history”, while George Will wrote that history had “returned from vacation”.
But these problems are not obviously insoluble on the basis of liberal principles, nor so serious that they would necessarily lead to the collapse of society as a whole, as communism collapsed in the s. Pe de alta parte, in urma conflictului ideologic Est-Vest, ideologia dominanta a invins ridicand Cortina de Fier, insa acest lucru nu va dura foarte mult, vechiul conflict urmand a fi inlocuit cu altul – cultural sau civilizational Huntington.
Aceasta aducere la un numitor comun este interpretata de Fukuyama ca fiind “sfarsitul istoriei”. Indeed, as our experiences in dealing with Europe on matters such as terrorism or Libya prove, they are much further gone than we down the road that denies the legitimacy of the use of force in farncis politics, even in self-defense.
Disponibil in 14 zile!
Recenzie [Sfarsitul Istoriei – Francis Fukuyama] – [DOC Document]
Most of these analyses lack any larger conceptual framework for distinguishing between what is essential and what is contingent or accidental in world history, and are predictably superficial. The struggle for recognition provides us with insight into the nature of international politics.
Naipaul traveling in Khomeini’s Iran shortly after the revolution noted the omnipresent signs advertising the products of Sony, Hitachi, and JVC, whose appeal remained virtually irresistible and gave the lie to the regime’s pretensions of restoring a state based on the rule of the Shariah.
Francis Fukuyama – Wikipedia
The most extreme form of nationalism that any Fukuyaam European state has mustered since has been Gaullism, whose self-assertion has been confined largely to the realm of nuisance politics and culture. The other major “contradiction” potentially unresolvable by liberalism is the one posed by nationalism and other forms of racial and ethnic consciousness. Este mai degraba o “uniformizare”. But the deeper and more profound question concerns istoruei goodness of Liberal democracy itself, and not only whether it will succeed against its present-day rivals.
Derrida goes on to analyze Fukuyama’s book as taking part in the intellectual branch of current Western hegemony and the spreading of its “New Gospel”: Fukuyama declared he would not be voting for Bush,  and that the Bush administration had made three mistakes: